Friday, June 05, 2015

The influence of NAFTA


The influence of NAFTA


12H2013 Yukino Ebina

        
           In these days, many countries are trying to combine with others in economics because it is essential to create much benefit and poverty. Thus there are a lot of regional communities across the border. Especially, NAFTA has the powerful influence not only North America but also all over the world. NAFTA is the treaty that was concluded among Canada, the U.S. and Mexico. These countries started to negotiate about the agreement in 1994 and it had spent 14 years to be implemented. The treaty eliminated the tariff to trade their products. The arrangement was admired most of areas. In 1993, the amount of the trade was $290 billion among three countries. Thanks to the treaty, it increased more than $1.1 trillion in 2012. It is said that The U.S. trades more in goods and services with Mexico and Canada than it does with Japan, South Korea, Brazil, Russia, India, and China combined.  This result shows the business within NAFTA occupies large part of the whole trade in three country. The treaty contributes to revitalize the trade among these countries.

              Though this agreement acts on promotion of the trade, it also causes harmful influence to the external economy for both countries between the U.S. and Mexico. For instance, many companies in the United States have moved to Mexico because they prefer cheaper labors. It is because the treaty allows them to be multinational companies and expand their business across the border. This moving causes about 700,000 jobs loss in the U.S. Furthermore, these corporations force their labor to agree being cut the wage. The companies threatened workers to relocate to other countries if they were not obey cutting their salary down. These corporations also frighten the local government to reduce their tax as the same reason. In these points, the treaty is profitable for the multinational companies. On the other hand, the agreement is disadvantage for the small sectors such as local farming. For instance, the United States have been protected the price of agricultural products for a long time and the government subsides approximately $16.5 billion of funding every year to suspect the price. Then the gap of the price appears between Mexico and the U.S because it is not rectified by the tariff. This caused the price down of the crops in Mexico and it became difficult to continue their farming. Furthermore, the number of Mexican migrant to the U.S has been increasing after the treaty to search their job. In these points, small sectors such as farmers or labor are caused the damage because of NAFTA. Moreover, increasing the number of people who are suffering from the poverty tends to caused organized crime like smuggling arms and illegal substances. This means the poverty caused by the treaty bring on the multinational crime.

In conclusion, the NAFTA have a great power and influence to both internal and international economy. The treaty is profitable for the multinational corporation and unfavorable for the local business. Today, many countries are negotiating to join the regional agreement such as Trans Pacific Partnership including Japan. These treaty have been increasing because many countries are interested in improving their economy. NAFTA is seen as a pioneer of these treaty and we have to think about both of positive and negative aspects. 

 

 

Reference lists

Mohammed Aly Sergie, NAFTA’s Economic Impact, 2014 http://www.cfr.org/trade/naftas-economic-impact/p15790 , Council onForeign Relations, February 14


Jeff Faux, NAFTA’s Impact on U.S. Workers, 2013 http://www.epi.org/blog/naftas-impact-workers/, Economic Policy Institute, December 9


Susana G. Baumann, Agricultural Subsidies Impact on Mexican farmers, 2014 http://voxxi.com/2013/01/11/agricultural-subsidies-mexican-farmers/, VOXXI, January 1


Laura Carlsen, Under Nafta, Mexico Suffered, and the United States Felt Its Pain 2013 http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/11/24/what-weve-learned-from-nafta/under-nafta-mexico-suffered-and-the-united-states-felt-its-pain, The New York Times, November 24

Thursday, June 04, 2015

Animal rights



Animal rights


 
Contents

  1. Introductio
  2. Situation
  3. Issues
  4. Solution
  5. Conclusion
 

1, Introduction

 Animal rights are an idea that people should treat animals well, and especially not use them in tests to develop medicines or other products: fur , wool, angora, etc.
  Lately these rights has become common, especially in Europe. The animal rights movement is developing. The animal rights movement is quite clearly one of the great movements for social change.

 

2, Situation

In Spain – bullfighting

Bullfighting was banned in the Spanish autonomous community of Catalonia by a vote of the Catalan Parliament in July 2010. The ban came into effect on 1 January 2012. The last bullfight in the region took place in Barcelona in September 2011.


In Switzerland

Farming and fishing are also regulated to ensure that the treatment of farm animals and fish is humane. Sadly there are however cases of animal abuse and illegal practices, and animal rights groups continue to campaign for these to be stopped. The new law of Switzerland, farmers will not be able to feed the pigs and cattle on hard floors, they argues that international competitiveness will be weak  because of the law.


Foie-gras

To produce fois-gras , workers ram pipes down male duck’s or geese’s throats two or three times daily. Many birds difficultly standing because of their engorged livers, and they may tear out their own feathers and cannibalize each other out of stress.

RED : Countries and regions where the production of Foie-Gras is banned

BLEUE :Main countries and regions producing Foie-Gras
 

The force feeding of animals for non-medical purposes, essential to current foie-gras production practices, is clearly prohibited by specific laws in six of nine Austrian provinces, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Norway, Poland, or following interpretation of general animal protection laws in Ireland, Sweden, Switzerland, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.
 

Dolphin drive hunting

December 1980 , in Japan of Iki (Nagasaki ) , " Greenpeace " ( US Hawaii ) was arrested because they released dolphins that were captured for extermination.  However , they claimed  " We prefer the dolphin , than the fishermen of Iki , dophines have the right to feed on yellowtail ". This incident is attracted international attention , thereafter , it became the beginning of  criticism of dolphin drive hunting and Japan's whaling .

 
In india

The Indian government did not recently grant legal personhood status to dolphins. But it did abolish the use of dolphins in aquatic theme parks.The probable cause for the legal personhood confusion stems from a misreading of a government statement claiming that Whereas cetaceans in general are highly intelligent and sensitive, and various scientists who have researched dolphin behavior have suggested that the unusually high intelligence; as compared to other animals means that dolphins should be seen as ‘non-human persons’ and as such should have their own specific rights and is morally unacceptable to keep them captive for entertainment purpose.

Romania debates giving human rights to dolphins

 

The 39-year-old activist politician introduced a bill in parliament that would recognize the marine mammals as "non-human persons", on account of their highly developed intelligence, personalities and behavior patterns.The bill, which will be debated in the Romanian upper house in the coming weeks, would make humans and dolphins equal before the law. Dolphin killers would be given the same sentences as murderers of human beings. The bill would also ban the use of dolphins in live entertainment shows.

 

3. Issue

First, the Animal Protection Movement progress. There are many organizations that protect animal rights in the world.Furthermore, Ecoterrosism appeared. They are extremism in the Animal Rights and Environmentalist Movements. Some people suffered damage because of them.

Second, farmers are declining international competitiveness. If farmers stop Intensive animal farming, it will take a high cost.

Third,the food culture. If they can not produce fois-gras , the food culture will disappear.And dolphins unusually have high intelligence as compared to other animals?

How about other animals ?If they are not intelligent , does not they have right ?



4. Solution

 CONSUMER EDUCATION

We need to choose the right food is one of the most important , everyday activities that can reduce our individual environmental impact .We work hard behind the scenes to educate consumers about the impact of our food choices on our health and the environment.

SUPPORT

To allow management that are friendly to animal welfare , the government should create a policy to assist the improvement of the welfare level .

 

Animal Welfare Approved (AWA)


It is the food label for meat and dairy products that come from farm animals raised to the highest animal welfare and environmental standards. The program was founded in 2006 as a market-based solution to the growing consumer demand for meat, eggs and dairy products from animals treated with high welfare and managed with the environment in mind.

Freedom food


Freedom Food is the only UK assurance and food labelling scheme dedicated solely to improving farm animal welfare.they have more than 3,000 members across farming and food production and you can buy freedom food labelled meat, fish and eggs in many of the UK’s supermarkets.

 

5. Conclusion

We should be thinking about animal rights as a consumer.Relationship of humans and animals.The animal rights movement.It is strongly associated with our health.We should know how we can get our food.

                                                                                            

References

  動物に権利はあるか ローレンス・プリグル著